NIKHIL PUNJABHAI PARMAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 36/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 11th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJAH010010262026
Filing Number
36/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
36/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191045260040
Police Station
SOLA HIGH COURT POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIKHIL PUNJABHAI PARMAR
Adv. B C CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary: The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad dismissed Nikhil Punjabhai Parmar's revision application seeking interim custody of his CNG auto-rickshaw, which was seized during a prohibition act offense involving 110 liters of illegally transported liquor. The court held that under Section 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and the 2019 government notification, vehicles cannot be released on interim basis when the seized liquor quantity exceeds 20 liters, citing binding High Court precedent that magistrates lack jurisdiction to order interim release in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2026
Summary: The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad dismissed Nikhil Punjabhai Parmar's revision application seeking interim custody of his CNG auto-rickshaw, which was seized during a prohibition act offense involving 110 liters of illegally transported liquor. The court held that under Section 98(2) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and the 2019 government notification, vehicles cannot be released on interim basis when the seized liquor quantity exceeds 20 liters, citing binding High Court precedent that magistrates lack jurisdiction to order interim release in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts