DUDHELA RADHAKISHNA MADHUKARRAO vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 439/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(1)B. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010009822026
Filing Number
439/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
439/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191028221025
Police Station
VEJALPUR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DUDHELA RADHAKISHNA MADHUKARRAO
Adv. G M PARMAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court partly allowed the application and granted temporary relaxation of the High Court's bail condition restricting the accused from leaving Gujarat. The accused is permitted to leave Gujarat for 20 days (until 02/04/2026) to visit his residence and workplace in Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, subject to strict safeguards including biweekly police check-ins, keeping his mobile active, and providing advance notice of his travel plans. The court clarified this is only temporary relaxation and not a permanent modification of the High Court's bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court partly allowed the application and granted temporary relaxation of the High Court's bail condition restricting the accused from leaving Gujarat. The accused is permitted to leave Gujarat for 20 days (until 02/04/2026) to visit his residence and workplace in Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, subject to strict safeguards including biweekly police check-ins, keeping his mobile active, and providing advance notice of his travel plans. The court clarified this is only temporary relaxation and not a permanent modification of the High Court's bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts