THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs GUNVANTBHAI KESHAVLAL PATEL Advocate - M H PATEL — 72/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,409,420,120(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJAH010009722024
Filing Number
72/2024
Filing Date
09-02-2024
Registration No
72/2024
Registration Date
09-02-2024
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
NARANPURA POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD CITY
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. T P CHUDASAMA
Respondent(s)
GUNVANTBHAI KESHAVLAL PATEL Advocate - M H PATEL
KAMLESH VASUBHAI PATEL
Adv. M H PATEL
SAHDEVSINH JASHUJI VAGHELA
Adv. M H PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 30-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 25-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 24-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Judgment The Ahmednagar District and Sessions Court acquitted three defendants charged with unauthorized securities trading and fraud under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 120(B), Securities Contracts Regulation Act 1956 section 23(1)(f), and Information Technology Act 2000 sections 65-66. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused conducted illegal "bucket shop" trading, misappropriated government tax revenues, or violated SEBI regulations despite confiscating computers and trading records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Judgment The Ahmednagar District and Sessions Court acquitted three defendants charged with unauthorized securities trading and fraud under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 120(B), Securities Contracts Regulation Act 1956 section 23(1)(f), and Information Technology Act 2000 sections 65-66. The court found insufficient evidence that the accused conducted illegal "bucket shop" trading, misappropriated government tax revenues, or violated SEBI regulations despite confiscating computers and trading records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts