SATISHBHAI PRAVINCHANDRA THAKKAR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 394/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010008632026
Filing Number
394/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
394/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
ANANDNAGAR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATISHBHAI PRAVINCHANDRA THAKKAR
Adv. B P WADHAVANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court allowed the petitioner Satishbhai Pravinchandra Thakkar's revision petition challenging the lower court's dismissal of his anticipatory bail application. The court found that the lower court erred by rejecting the bail plea on grounds that were either incorrect or unknown to the petitioner at the time of the decision, such as claims about his sick son and mother, his driving in multiple states, and his poor financial condition. The court set aside the delay in filing the revision petition and directed that the revision petition be registered and the anticipatory bail application be heard afresh on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Apr-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Apr-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 394/2026
The court allowed the petitioner Satishbhai Pravinchandra Thakkar's revision petition challenging the lower court's dismissal of his anticipatory bail application. The court found that the lower court erred by rejecting the bail plea on grounds that were either incorrect or unknown to the petitioner at the time of the decision, such as claims about his sick son and mother, his driving in multiple states, and his poor financial condition. The court set aside the delay in filing the revision petition and directed that the revision petition be registered and the anticipatory bail application be heard afresh on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts