RAVIBHAI MAHESHBHAI DANTANI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 29/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CR RA - CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION
CNR: GJAH010008532026
Filing Number
29/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
29/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
3-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 15-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11191045250970
Police Station
SOLA HIGH COURT POLICE STATION- AHMEDABAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVIBHAI MAHESHBHAI DANTANI
Adv. B V DHAVAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court granted a Revision Petition filed by the appellant, setting aside the Trial Court's order that had rejected the release of a vehicle. The court found that the Trial Court lacked jurisdiction to order vehicle seizure under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 92(2), and that the order was legally defective and contrary to established procedural law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
4th Addl District Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 29/2026
The court granted a Revision Petition filed by the appellant, setting aside the Trial Court's order that had rejected the release of a vehicle. The court found that the Trial Court lacked jurisdiction to order vehicle seizure under the Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 92(2), and that the order was legally defective and contrary to established procedural law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts