DILIPBHAI DANUBHAI vs KIRITSINH LAKSHMANSINH PADHERIYA Advocate - V A PUROHIT — 16/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJAH010007412025
Filing Number
16/2025
Filing Date
28-Jan-2025
Registration No
16/2025
Registration Date
28-Jan-2025
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DILIPBHAI DANUBHAI
Adv. K M SOYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.KIRITSINH LAKSHMANSINH PADHERIYA Advocate - V A PUROHIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary of Case 16/2025 The Principal District & Sessions Judge dismissed Dilipbhai Danubhai's appeal against the trial court's rejection of his plaint. Danubhai sought cancellation of a 2001 registered sale deed, claiming it contained forged signatures executed in the defendant's favor. Although Danubhai obtained the deed's copy in June 2012 and received a forensic report confirming forgery in March 2017, the court found the suit time-barred under Article 59 of the Limitation Act (3-year period from knowledge of facts). The court rejected arguments that the cause of action was continuous, holding that the plaintiff's five-year delay after discovering the deed in 2012 before filing suit in 2017 violated statutory limitation requirements and constituted an attempt to artificially extend the limitation period through expert opinion timing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
05-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Addl.district & Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
29-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
For R&P
4th Addl District Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Reply
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-May-2025
Notice To Opponents
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Apr-2025
Notice To Opponents
4th Addl District Judge
-
27-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2025
Summary of Case 16/2025 The Principal District & Sessions Judge dismissed Dilipbhai Danubhai's appeal against the trial court's rejection of his plaint. Danubhai sought cancellation of a 2001 registered sale deed, claiming it contained forged signatures executed in the defendant's favor. Although Danubhai obtained the deed's copy in June 2012 and received a forensic report confirming forgery in March 2017, the court found the suit time-barred under Article 59 of the Limitation Act (3-year period from knowledge of facts). The court rejected arguments that the cause of action was continuous, holding that the plaintiff's five-year delay after discovering the deed in 2012 before filing suit in 2017 violated statutory limitation requirements and constituted an attempt to artificially extend the limitation period through expert opinion timing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts