HEIRS OF DECEASED KARIMKHANJI JORAVARKHANJI TALUKDAR(Legal Heir) vs HEIRS OF DECEASED ASHRAFALI MAHAMADALI SAIYAD-MUMTAZBIBI ASHRAFALI SAIYAD1. — 15/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24,151. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA DC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - DISTRICT COURT

CNR: GJAH010005212026

Filing Number

15/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24,151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEIRS OF DECEASED KARIMKHANJI JORAVARKHANJI TALUKDAR(Legal Heir)

    Adv. R N KIKANI1.

  2. 2.MASHUDKHANJI KARIMKHANJI TALUKDAR 1.

  3. 3.MUNAFKHANJI KARIMKHANJI TALUKDAR 1.

  4. 4.HEIRS OF DECEASED HAFIZABEGAM KARIMKHAN TALUKDAR(Legal Heir) 1.3.

  5. 5.ANWARHUSENJI MALEK 1.3.

  6. 6.BILKISHBANU GULAMHUSEN MALEK 1.3.

  7. 7.BAITULBANU IMRANKHAN PATHAN 1.3.

  8. 8.MALIK JAKIRHUSEN ANVARHUSEN 1.

  9. 9.RUKHSANABEGAM DAUGHTER OF KARIM KHANJI TALUKDAR AND WIFE OF IFTICAR SHEKH 1.

  10. 10.ZAHEDABEGAM DAUGHTER OF KARIMKHANJI TALUKDAR AND WIFE OF NASIRHUSEN SIDDIQUI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HEIRS OF DECEASED ASHRAFALI MAHAMADALI SAIYAD-MUMTAZBIBI ASHRAFALI SAIYAD1.

  2. 2.SAYRABANU DAUGHTER OF ASHRAFALI SAIYAD AND WIFE OF SALIMBHAI

    Adv. S S DAVE1.

  3. 3.LIYAKATALI ASHRAFALI SAIYAD

    Adv. S S DAVE1.

  4. 4.SHAHENAJBANU DAUGHTER OF ASHRAFALI SAIYAD AND WIFE OF ISMAILBHAI

    Adv. S S DAVE1.

  5. 5.ALTAFHUSEN ASHRAFALI SAIYAD

    Adv. S S DAVE1.

  6. 6.MUSTAKALI ASHRAFALI SAIYAD

    Adv. S S DAVE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CMA No. 15/2026 The Principal District Judge rejected the applicants' transfer application for two 30-year-old property dispute suits (RCS 237/1994 and 238/1994) pending in Dholka Court. The applicants alleged judicial bias, claiming the trial judge favored the respondents' advocate through preferential scheduling and cost impositions. The court found no justifiable grounds for transfer, noting the trial court had impartially imposed harsh orders on both parties for non-compliance and that unfavorable rulings do not constitute bias. The judge directed expeditious trial continuation per High Court directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMA No. 15/2026 The Principal District Judge rejected the applicants' transfer application for two 30-year-old property dispute suits (RCS 237/1994 and 238/1994) pending in Dholka Court. The applicants alleged judicial bias, claiming the trial judge favored the respondents' advocate through preferential scheduling and cost impositions. The court found no justifiable grounds for transfer, noting the trial court had impartially imposed harsh orders on both parties for non-compliance and that unfavorable rulings do not constitute bias. The judge directed expeditious trial continuation per High Court directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case