PATEL BHAILALBHAI LALJIBHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 230/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJAH010005102026
Filing Number
230/2026
Filing Date
23-01-2026
Registration No
230/2026
Registration Date
23-01-2026
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11201001240023
Police Station
CID CRIME GANDHINAGAR ZONE POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PATEL BHAILALBHAI LALJIBHAI
Adv. D J PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) rejected the applicant's criminal miscellaneous application seeking to unfreeze his bank account. The court found that Rs. 50 lakhs received by the applicant (a trustee of Grow More Foundation Trust) originated from victims through the main accused Bhupendrasinh Zala, and the applicant failed to provide credible evidence to substantiate his claim of having given a loan to justify the transfer, despite multiple court opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) rejected the applicant's criminal miscellaneous application seeking to unfreeze his bank account. The court found that Rs. 50 lakhs received by the applicant (a trustee of Grow More Foundation Trust) originated from victims through the main accused Bhupendrasinh Zala, and the applicant failed to provide credible evidence to substantiate his claim of having given a loan to justify the transfer, despite multiple court opportunities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts