THALE SUJIT SANTOSH vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 169/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010003702026

Case disposed

Filing Number

169/2026

Filing Date

17-01-2026

Registration No

169/2026

Registration Date

17-01-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191028250559

Police Station

VEJALPUR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 118(1),115(2),296(B),54
SCHEDULED CASTS AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF TROCITIES) ACT, 1989 Section 3(2)(5-A),3(1)(R),3(1)(S)
BOMBAY POLICE (GUJARAT AMENDMENT AND VALIDATION) ACT Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

THALE SUJIT SANTOSH

Adv. K R SHARMA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

ORIGINAL COMPLAINANT

Hearing History

Judge: 5-5th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

01-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

HEARING

27-03-2026

HEARING

25-03-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad, rejected the anticipatory bail application of 19-year-old Sujit Santosh Thale in an alleged atrocity offense case. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on CCTV footage showing his presence at the incident scene and his own admission of inflicting a fist blow on the complainant. The statutory bar under Section 18(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 prevented the court from granting pre-arrest bail, and the parity argument citing co-accused bail was rejected as legally inapplicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad, rejected the anticipatory bail application of 19-year-old Sujit Santosh Thale in an alleged atrocity offense case. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on CCTV footage showing his presence at the incident scene and his own admission of inflicting a fist blow on the complainant. The statutory bar under Section 18(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 prevented the court from granting pre-arrest bail, and the parity argument citing co-accused bail was rejected as legally inapplicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Ahmedabad District All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case