THALE SUJIT SANTOSH vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 169/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010003702026

Filing Number

169/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

169/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

5-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11191028250559

Police Station

VEJALPUR POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 118(1),115(2),296(B),54
Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Trocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(2)(5-A),3(1)(R),3(1)(S)
Bombay Police (Gujarat Amendment and Validation) Act Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THALE SUJIT SANTOSH

    Adv. K R SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

  2. 2.ORIGINAL COMPLAINANT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad, rejected the anticipatory bail application of 19-year-old Sujit Santosh Thale in an alleged atrocity offense case. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on CCTV footage showing his presence at the incident scene and his own admission of inflicting a fist blow on the complainant. The statutory bar under Section 18(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 prevented the court from granting pre-arrest bail, and the parity argument citing co-accused bail was rejected as legally inapplicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  9. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  10. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  11. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  12. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  13. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  14. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  15. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  16. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  17. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  18. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  19. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  20. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  21. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  22. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  23. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  24. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  25. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  26. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 169/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad, rejected the anticipatory bail application of 19-year-old Sujit Santosh Thale in an alleged atrocity offense case. The court found a prima facie case against the applicant based on CCTV footage showing his presence at the incident scene and his own admission of inflicting a fist blow on the complainant. The statutory bar under Section 18(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 prevented the court from granting pre-arrest bail, and the parity argument citing co-accused bail was rejected as legally inapplicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case