AMRUTBHAI ALIAS AMIT DHIRUBHAI MAKWANA RASHAMIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI, K M DASTOOR — 112/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJAH010002372026

Filing Number

112/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

112/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

5-5th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11192018250614

Police Station

DHANDHUKA POLICE STATION - AHMEDABAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 108,351(3),296(B),189(2),190,54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMRUTBHAI ALIAS AMIT DHIRUBHAI MAKWANA RASHAMIYA

    Adv. M A PATHAN

  2. 2.BHARATBHAI DHIRUBHAI MAKWANA RASHAMIYA

  3. 3.ASHOKBHAI ALIAS PAPPUBHAI PARSHOTTAMBHAI MAKWANA RASHAMIYA

  4. 4.KAMLESHBHAI PRAVINBHAI MAKWANA RASHAMIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI, K M DASTOOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad rejected the anticipatory bail application of three accused (Amrutbhai, Ashokbhai, and Kamleshbhai Makwana) in a suicide abetment case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 108, 351(3), 296(b), 189(2), 190, and 54. The court found the allegations against them were not vague but prima facie showed a continuous course of harassment and intimidation allegedly leading to the deceased's suicide, with evidence that the deceased named them before his death. The court deemed custodial interrogation necessary to unearth facts and noted reasonable apprehension of witness tampering, making this unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl District Judge

  4. 03-Apr-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  8. 27-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  9. 25-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  10. 24-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  11. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  12. 20-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  13. 18-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  14. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  15. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  16. 13-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  17. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    5th Addl District Judge

  18. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  19. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  20. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  21. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  22. 09-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  23. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  24. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  25. 05-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  26. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  27. 20-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    5th Addl District Judge

  28. 17-Jan-2026

    Process To Respondents

    5th Addl District Judge

  29. 16-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad rejected the anticipatory bail application of three accused (Amrutbhai, Ashokbhai, and Kamleshbhai Makwana) in a suicide abetment case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 108, 351(3), 296(b), 189(2), 190, and 54. The court found the allegations against them were not vague but prima facie showed a continuous course of harassment and intimidation allegedly leading to the deceased's suicide, with evidence that the deceased named them before his death. The court deemed custodial interrogation necessary to unearth facts and noted reasonable apprehension of witness tampering, making this unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case