AKHTARBANU MAHAMMAD HANIF SHAIKH vs YASINBHAI BAPU @ CLUBVALA Advocate - A S TIMBALIA — 3/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
RCA - REGULAR CIVIL APPEAL
CNR: GJAH010001802020
Filing Number
3/2020
Filing Date
08-Jan-2020
Registration No
3/2020
Registration Date
08-Jan-2020
Court
Ahmedabad District
Judge
1-Principal District & Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AKHTARBANU MAHAMMAD HANIF SHAIKH
Adv. M J SHAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.YASINBHAI BAPU @ CLUBVALA Advocate - A S TIMBALIA
-
2.SHRIMATI KHATUNBIBI MAHMADBHAI
-
3.SHERUBHAI KADARBHAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: RCA No. 3 of 2020 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's rejection of the plaintiff's plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC. The court found the suit fatally defective for lacking cause of action, failing to establish how it falls within the limitation period, and violating Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act by not seeking a consequential declaration of ownership. Key Reasoning: The plaintiff's unregistered sale agreements from 1987-1988 could not establish legal title to the property, tax receipts showed her only as "occupier" (not owner), and she failed to clearly plead when defendants trespassed or why she delayed filing suit for ~30 years—rendering the claimed cause of action "manifestly vexatious and meritless" as clever drafting creating an illusion of legal right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal District & Sessions Judge
-
19-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
20-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-May-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
29-Mar-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
14-Feb-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
30-Nov-2024
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
05-Oct-2024
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
30-Aug-2024
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jul-2024
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
21-Jun-2024
Final Arguments
4th Addl District Judge
-
03-May-2024
Final Arguments
9th Addl District Judge
-
29-Mar-2024
Final Arguments
9th Addl District Judge
-
20-Jan-2024
Final Arguments
9th Addl District Judge
-
24-Nov-2023
Final Arguments
9th Addl District Judge
-
06-Oct-2023
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
11-Aug-2023
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
01-Jul-2023
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
28-Apr-2023
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
01-Apr-2023
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
17-Feb-2023
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
06-Jan-2023
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
03-Dec-2022
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
15-Oct-2022
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
06-Aug-2022
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
27-Jun-2022
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
22-Apr-2022
Hearing
7th Addl District Judge
-
25-Mar-2022
Hearing
7th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2022
Hearing
7th Addl District Judge
-
18-Feb-2022
Hearing
7th Addl District Judge
-
31-Dec-2021
Hearing
7th Addl District Judge
-
06-Dec-2021
Hearing
7th Addl District Judge
-
20-Nov-2021
Hearing
7th Addl District Judge
-
18-Sep-2021
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
07-Aug-2021
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
06-Jul-2021
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
01-May-2021
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
03-Apr-2021
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
22-Feb-2021
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
28-Dec-2020
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
27-Dec-2020
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
08-Dec-2020
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
23-Nov-2020
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
09-Nov-2020
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
17-Sep-2020
Hearing
8th Addl District Judge
-
21-Jul-2020
Hearing
9th Addl District Judge
-
25-Jun-2020
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
18-May-2020
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
29-Apr-2020
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2020
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
04-Feb-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2020
Case Summary: RCA No. 3 of 2020 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the trial court's rejection of the plaintiff's plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC. The court found the suit fatally defective for lacking cause of action, failing to establish how it falls within the limitation period, and violating Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act by not seeking a consequential declaration of ownership. Key Reasoning: The plaintiff's unregistered sale agreements from 1987-1988 could not establish legal title to the property, tax receipts showed her only as "occupier" (not owner), and she failed to clearly plead when defendants trespassed or why she delayed filing suit for ~30 years—rendering the claimed cause of action "manifestly vexatious and meritless" as clever drafting creating an illusion of legal right. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts