PRAKASHBHAI VIKRAMBHAI VALA PROPRIETOR OF SUBHAM AGRO CENTER vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI — 3/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJAH010000442026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

Ahmedabad District

Judge

2-10th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASHBHAI VIKRAMBHAI VALA PROPRIETOR OF SUBHAM AGRO CENTER

    Adv. I M KHAKHARIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - P M TRIVEDI

  2. 2.ASHOKKUMAR RANCHHODDAS PATEL DIRECTOR OF M.P.P.L BIOTECH PVT LTD

    Adv. Y O RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The appellate court set aside the conviction of Prakash Vikrambhai Vala under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (dishonored cheque) and acquitted him after the parties amicably settled the dispute. The accused had paid the cheque amount to the complainant, who consented to withdrawal of the case, leading to the court vacating the conviction, sentence, and compensation order passed by the trial court on 12.12.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    10th Addl District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For R&P

    10th Addl District Judge

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    For R&P

    10th Addl District Judge

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    For R&P

    10th Addl District Judge

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The appellate court set aside the conviction of Prakash Vikrambhai Vala under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (dishonored cheque) and acquitted him after the parties amicably settled the dispute. The accused had paid the cheque amount to the complainant, who consented to withdrawal of the case, leading to the court vacating the conviction, sentence, and compensation order passed by the trial court on 12.12.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case