PARVESH SHOKEEN vs SMT SHEELA DEVI — 808/2025

Status: Misc. cases/purpose. Next hearing: 17th August 2026.

Misc. cases/purpose Next hearing 17-Aug-2026 this date has passed

Civ DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ

CNR: DLWT010087572025

e-Filing Number

01-09-2025

Filing Number

5824/2025

Filing Date

02-Sep-2025

Registration No

808/2025

Registration Date

03-Sep-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC

Judge

158-District Judge

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARVESH SHOKEEN

    Adv. Amit Kashyap

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT SHEELA DEVI

Case History

  1. 17-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    Case 808/2025 Summary: In this civil suit between Parvesh Shokeen (plaintiff) and Smt Sheela Devi (defendant), the court completed the Affidavit of documents stage on 26.05.2026, with both parties denying each other's documents. The plaintiff's right to file replication was closed after failing to do so despite opportunity. The case was adjourned to 17.08.2026 for further proceedings, with the defendant's counsel permitted to file an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint for lack of proof of title over the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  6. 15-Dec-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  8. 03-Sep-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  9. 03-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 02-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 808/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 808/2025 Summary: In this civil suit between Parvesh Shokeen (plaintiff) and Smt Sheela Devi (defendant), the court completed the Affidavit of documents stage on 26.05.2026, with both parties denying each other's documents. The plaintiff's right to file replication was closed after failing to do so despite opportunity. The case was adjourned to 17.08.2026 for further proceedings, with the defendant's counsel permitted to file an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint for lack of proof of title over the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case