STATE vs TAJENDER SINGH @ RAJU @ DANT — 568/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,397,411,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: DLWT010076192021

Filing Number

4250/2021

Filing Date

12-Oct-2021

Registration No

568/2021

Registration Date

12-Oct-2021

Court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC

Judge

138-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

182

Police Station

NIHAL VIHAR

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 392,397,411,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TAJENDER SINGH @ RAJU @ DANT

  2. 2.Mahadev Solanki

  3. 3.Manish

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judgment

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

    The Delhi High Court acquitted all three accused—Tajender Singh, Madhav Solanki, and Manish—of charges under IPC sections 392/397/411/34 (dacoity, armed robbery, receiving stolen property) and Arms Act sections 25/27. The court ordered them to furnish a bond of Rs. 30,000 each with sureties for six months as a condition following acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  6. 28-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 25-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  8. 25-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge

  9. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  10. 21-Apr-2026

    Statement of Accused

    Additional Sessions Judge

  11. 15-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Order

  12. 15-Apr-2026

    Statement of Accused

    Additional Sessions Judge

  13. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Order

  14. 25-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  15. 20-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  16. 20-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  17. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  18. 14-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  19. 02-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  20. 05-Dec-2025

    Copy Of Order

  21. 05-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  22. 23-Aug-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  23. 23-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  24. 04-Jun-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  25. 04-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  26. 03-May-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  27. 03-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  28. 29-Mar-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  29. 29-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  30. 04-Mar-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  31. 04-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  32. 06-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  33. 24-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  34. 20-Jul-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  35. 20-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  36. 01-Jul-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  37. 01-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  38. 04-May-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  39. 04-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  40. 02-Apr-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  41. 02-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  42. 01-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  43. 23-Dec-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  44. 23-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  45. 09-Dec-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  46. 09-Dec-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  47. 18-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  48. 14-Oct-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  49. 14-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  50. 05-Oct-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  51. 05-Oct-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  52. 21-Sep-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  53. 21-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  54. 10-Aug-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  55. 10-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  56. 02-Jun-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  57. 02-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  58. 07-Mar-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  59. 07-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  60. 01-Feb-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  61. 01-Feb-2023

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  62. 13-Dec-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  63. 13-Dec-2022

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  64. 11-Nov-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  65. 11-Nov-2022

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  66. 14-Sep-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  67. 14-Sep-2022

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  68. 15-Jul-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  69. 15-Jul-2022

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge

  70. 04-May-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  71. 04-May-2022

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  72. 07-Mar-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  73. 07-Mar-2022

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  74. 10-Dec-2021

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  75. 10-Dec-2021

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  76. 12-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  77. 12-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 568/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi High Court acquitted all three accused—Tajender Singh, Madhav Solanki, and Manish—of charges under IPC sections 392/397/411/34 (dacoity, armed robbery, receiving stolen property) and Arms Act sections 25/27. The court ordered them to furnish a bond of Rs. 30,000 each with sureties for six months as a condition following acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case