GOPAL vs LAND ACQIDSITION COLLETOR — 42/2025
Status: Misc. cases/purpose. Next hearing: 31st August 2026.
LAC - LAND ACQ. ACT
CNR: DLWT010062832025
e-Filing Number
30-06-2025
Filing Number
4231/2025
Filing Date
01-Jul-2025
Registration No
42/2025
Registration Date
02-Jul-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
158-District Judge
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOPAL
Adv. Dushyant Bhargava
-
2.GEETA CHAUHAN
Adv. Dushyant Bhargava
-
3.LOVKESH CHAUHAN
Adv. Dushyant Bhargava
-
4.YOGESH CHAUHAN
Adv. Dushyant Bhargava
-
5.BAGESH CHAUHAN
Adv. Dushyant Bhargava
Respondent(s)
-
1.LAND ACQIDSITION COLLETOR
Case History
-
31-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
29-May-2026
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
Case 42/2025 Summary: The case filed by Gopal, Geeta, and Lovkesh Chauhan against the Land Acquisition Collector was adjourned on 29.05.2026 as no counsel appeared for the petitioners and the presiding officer was on leave. The court directed that the case be re-listed on 31.08.2026, noting that the petitioners' updated address had not been filed as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
28-May-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy Of Order
-
16-Mar-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
08-Dec-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
30-Aug-2025
Copy Of Order
-
30-Aug-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
02-Jul-2025
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
02-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 42/2025
Case 42/2025 Summary: The case filed by Gopal, Geeta, and Lovkesh Chauhan against the Land Acquisition Collector was adjourned on 29.05.2026 as no counsel appeared for the petitioners and the presiding officer was on leave. The court directed that the case be re-listed on 31.08.2026, noting that the petitioners' updated address had not been filed as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts