YES BANK LTD vs DAYANAND MOOLCHAND — 153/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1940 Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAW on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

ARBTN - ARBRITRATION CASES

CNR: DLWT010062532025

e-Filing Number

28-06-2025

Filing Number

4207/2025

Filing Date

30-Jun-2025

Registration No

153/2025

Registration Date

01-Jul-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC

Judge

158-District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAW

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1940 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YES BANK LTD

    Adv. KARTIK KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAYANAND MOOLCHAND

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    The petition filed by YES BANK LTD against Dayanand Moolchand was dismissed as withdrawn on 16.03.2026. The court granted YES BANK's counsel permission to withdraw the petition and reserved the bank's right to initiate arbitration proceedings against the respondent instead of pursuing the court case further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 23-Dec-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  7. 27-Oct-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 27-Oct-2025

    Misc./ Arguments

    District Judge

  9. 02-Aug-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  10. 02-Aug-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  11. 01-Jul-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  12. 01-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 30-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 153/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The petition filed by YES BANK LTD against Dayanand Moolchand was dismissed as withdrawn on 16.03.2026. The court granted YES BANK's counsel permission to withdraw the petition and reserved the bank's right to initiate arbitration proceedings against the respondent instead of pursuing the court case further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case