YES BANK LTD vs ARUN KUMAR — 154/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1940 Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAW on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

ARBTN - ARBRITRATION CASES

CNR: DLWT010057692025

e-Filing Number

07-06-2025

Filing Number

3885/2025

Filing Date

09-Jun-2025

Registration No

154/2025

Registration Date

01-Jul-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC

Judge

158-District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAW

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1940 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YES BANK LTD

    Adv. KARTIK KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARUN KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The Delhi High Court dismissed YES Bank Ltd's arbitration petition against Arun Kumar on 16.03.2026 as withdrawn, permitting the bank to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings against the respondent. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's request to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue arbitration, allowing the matter to proceed through the alternative dispute resolution mechanism. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 23-Dec-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  7. 27-Oct-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 27-Oct-2025

    Misc./ Arguments

    District Judge

  9. 02-Aug-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  10. 02-Aug-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  11. 01-Jul-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  12. 01-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 09-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 154/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed YES Bank Ltd's arbitration petition against Arun Kumar on 16.03.2026 as withdrawn, permitting the bank to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings against the respondent. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's request to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue arbitration, allowing the matter to proceed through the alternative dispute resolution mechanism. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case