INDOSPIRIT BARS P. LTD. vs RAVINDER KUMAR — 213/2020
Case under Recovery of Money Section 74. Disposed: Contested--DECREE on 14th March 2026.
Civ DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLWT010055132019
Filing Number
2665/2019
Filing Date
16-07-2019
Registration No
213/2020
Registration Date
17-07-2019
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
158-District Judge
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INDOSPIRIT BARS P. LTD.
Adv. HEMANT UPPAL
Respondent(s)
RAVINDER KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 158-District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Final Arguments
Final Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 04-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 28-01-2026 | Final Arguments |
| 17-12-2025 | Final Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: Indospirit Bars P. Ltd. v. Ravinder Kumar (213/2020) The Delhi District Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff company, ordering the defendant to refund Rs. 5 lakhs (interest-free refundable security deposit) with 9% annual interest from September 1, 2016. The court found that no valid lease deed was ever executed between the parties because the defendant failed to provide essential property documents, preventing the plaintiff from obtaining necessary government licenses for operating a bar, and the lease terms were never finalized as evidenced by conflicting draft documents sent over a year apart. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: Indospirit Bars P. Ltd. v. Ravinder Kumar (213/2020) The Delhi District Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff company, ordering the defendant to refund Rs. 5 lakhs (interest-free refundable security deposit) with 9% annual interest from September 1, 2016. The court found that no valid lease deed was ever executed between the parties because the defendant failed to provide essential property documents, preventing the plaintiff from obtaining necessary government licenses for operating a bar, and the lease terms were never finalized as evidenced by conflicting draft documents sent over a year apart. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts