ATUL KUMAR vs BIMLA DEVI Advocate - SUNIL KHANNA — 612897/2016
Case under Partition Section SEPRATE. Status: Misc. Arguments. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
Civ DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLWT010039262016
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
Filing Number
76306/2016
Filing Date
13-04-2012
Registration No
612897/2016
Registration Date
12-07-2016
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
201-District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ATUL KUMAR
Adv. VINEET SHARMA
TARUN KUMAR
Adv. VINEET SHARMA
JATIN KUMAR (MINOR)
Adv. VINIT SHARMA
RUCHIKA KUMARI
Adv. VINEET SHARMA
NEHA KUMARI (MINOR)
Adv. VINEET SHARMA
Respondent(s)
BIMLA DEVI Advocate - SUNIL KHANNA
KAMLESH @ KAMLA DEVI
Adv. SUNIL KHANNA
SEEMA @ BABBLI
Adv. SUNIL KHANNA
MAMTA
Adv. SUNIL KHANNA
PUSHPA DEVI
Adv. SUNIL KHANNA
RAJNI DEIV
Adv. SUNIL KHANNA
Hearing History
Judge: 201-District Judge
Misc. Arguments
Misc. cases/purpose
Misc. Arguments
Misc. Arguments
Misc. Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Misc. Arguments |
| 15-04-2026 | Misc. cases/purpose |
| 13-03-2026 | Misc. Arguments |
| 31-01-2026 | Misc. Arguments |
| 19-12-2025 | Misc. Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In this partition suit (612897/2016), the Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC to implead the legal representatives (heirs) of deceased defendant no.2, ruling that the right to sue survives in partition cases. However, the court struck off an amended memo of parties that unilaterally added defendants 4A-4D without prior permission or notice, directing the plaintiff to file a fresh amended memo and seek formal approval. The matter was adjourned to 01.07.2026 for arguments on pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In this partition suit (612897/2016), the Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC to implead the legal representatives (heirs) of deceased defendant no.2, ruling that the right to sue survives in partition cases. However, the court struck off an amended memo of parties that unilaterally added defendants 4A-4D without prior permission or notice, directing the plaintiff to file a fresh amended memo and seek formal approval. The matter was adjourned to 01.07.2026 for arguments on pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts