STATE vs KRISH — 457/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th March 2026.

Bail Matters

CNR: DLWT010031612026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1037/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

457/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC

Judge

138-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

417

Police Station

Patel Nagar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Adv. xyz

Respondent(s)

KRISH

Hearing History

Judge: 138-Additional Sessions Judge

30-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

For Bail

24-03-2026

For Bail

20-03-2026

For Bail

14-03-2026

For Bail

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER

Case Summary: State v. Krish (457/2026) The court granted regular bail to Krish Sharma in a case involving alleged criminal assault with baseball bats on a complainant and his father at their shop in October 2025. Although CCTV footage showed the accused assaulting the victim and the chargesheet was filed, the court found that investigation was complete, the accused had no prior criminal record, and two months of custody had already been served; keeping him further detained served no purpose when trial would take considerable time. Bail was granted on a Rs. 30,000 bond with strict conditions prohibiting witness contact, tampering with evidence, and non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

24-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Krish (457/2026) The court granted regular bail to Krish Sharma in a case involving alleged criminal assault with baseball bats on a complainant and his father at their shop in October 2025. Although CCTV footage showed the accused assaulting the victim and the chargesheet was filed, the court found that investigation was complete, the accused had no prior criminal record, and two months of custody had already been served; keeping him further detained served no purpose when trial would take considerable time. Bail was granted on a Rs. 30,000 bond with strict conditions prohibiting witness contact, tampering with evidence, and non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case