STATE vs KRISH — 457/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLWT010031612026
Filing Number
1037/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
457/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
138-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
417
Police Station
Patel Nagar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. xyz
Respondent(s)
KRISH
Hearing History
Judge: 138-Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
For Bail
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 24-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 20-03-2026 | For Bail |
| 14-03-2026 | For Bail |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Krish (457/2026) The court granted regular bail to Krish Sharma in a case involving alleged criminal assault with baseball bats on a complainant and his father at their shop in October 2025. Although CCTV footage showed the accused assaulting the victim and the chargesheet was filed, the court found that investigation was complete, the accused had no prior criminal record, and two months of custody had already been served; keeping him further detained served no purpose when trial would take considerable time. Bail was granted on a Rs. 30,000 bond with strict conditions prohibiting witness contact, tampering with evidence, and non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State v. Krish (457/2026) The court granted regular bail to Krish Sharma in a case involving alleged criminal assault with baseball bats on a complainant and his father at their shop in October 2025. Although CCTV footage showed the accused assaulting the victim and the chargesheet was filed, the court found that investigation was complete, the accused had no prior criminal record, and two months of custody had already been served; keeping him further detained served no purpose when trial would take considerable time. Bail was granted on a Rs. 30,000 bond with strict conditions prohibiting witness contact, tampering with evidence, and non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts