STATE vs VINAY MALHOTRA ALIAS SHIVAM — 456/2026
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 22/25. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 20th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLWT010031212026
Filing Number
1018/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
456/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
156-Special Judge
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
265
Police Station
Crime Branch-West Delhi
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. xyz
Respondent(s)
-
1.VINAY MALHOTRA ALIAS SHIVAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
The court dismissed Vinay Malhotra's interim bail application in this NDPS case. Malhotra was arrested after 3,360 Tramadol capsules and 84 Codeine syrup were recovered from his pharmacy on 22.09.2025, constituting commercial quantity and attracting a bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Although the accused claimed his family required his care—his son having a wind-swept deformity and wife having cardiac ailment—the court found medical verification showed the wife's condition was stable and the son had discontinued treatment since 2022 with no immediate urgency, rejecting the hardship plea given the serious nature of allegations and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
For Bail
Special Judge
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 456/2026
The court dismissed Vinay Malhotra's interim bail application in this NDPS case. Malhotra was arrested after 3,360 Tramadol capsules and 84 Codeine syrup were recovered from his pharmacy on 22.09.2025, constituting commercial quantity and attracting a bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Although the accused claimed his family required his care—his son having a wind-swept deformity and wife having cardiac ailment—the court found medical verification showed the wife's condition was stable and the son had discontinued treatment since 2022 with no immediate urgency, rejecting the hardship plea given the serious nature of allegations and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts