STATE vs RAMAN DEEP SINGH — 122/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376/354A/354. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 20th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLWT010030872026
Filing Number
1003/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
122/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
156-Special Judge
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
77
Police Station
Moti Nagar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. xyz
Respondent(s)
RAMAN DEEP SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 156-Special Judge
Disposed
FRESH APPLICATION
FRESH APPLICATION
FRESH APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | FRESH APPLICATION |
| 16-03-2026 | FRESH APPLICATION |
| 13-03-2026 | FRESH APPLICATION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Raman Deep Singh (M 122/2026) The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Raman Deep Singh, who was charged under IPC sections 376/354A/354 for alleged rape and sexual harassment. The accused claimed the relationship with the complainant was consensual and that family pressure led to false allegations, but the court found the allegations serious and credible, noting the accused allegedly deceived the woman with false divorce papers while already married, made obscene videos without consent, and threatened her with their misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State v. Raman Deep Singh (M 122/2026) The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Raman Deep Singh, who was charged under IPC sections 376/354A/354 for alleged rape and sexual harassment. The accused claimed the relationship with the complainant was consensual and that family pressure led to false allegations, but the court found the allegations serious and credible, noting the accused allegedly deceived the woman with false divorce papers while already married, made obscene videos without consent, and threatened her with their misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts