STATE vs RAMAN DEEP SINGH — 122/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376/354A/354. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 20th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLWT010030872026
Filing Number
1003/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
122/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
156-Special Judge
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
77
Police Station
Moti Nagar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. xyz
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMAN DEEP SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Raman Deep Singh (M 122/2026) The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Raman Deep Singh, who was charged under IPC sections 376/354A/354 for alleged rape and sexual harassment. The accused claimed the relationship with the complainant was consensual and that family pressure led to false allegations, but the court found the allegations serious and credible, noting the accused allegedly deceived the woman with false divorce papers while already married, made obscene videos without consent, and threatened her with their misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Fresh Application
Additional Sessions Judge - 03
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Fresh Application
Special Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 122/2026
Case Summary: State v. Raman Deep Singh (M 122/2026) The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by accused Raman Deep Singh, who was charged under IPC sections 376/354A/354 for alleged rape and sexual harassment. The accused claimed the relationship with the complainant was consensual and that family pressure led to false allegations, but the court found the allegations serious and credible, noting the accused allegedly deceived the woman with false divorce papers while already married, made obscene videos without consent, and threatened her with their misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts