STATE vs GAURAV VIJ ALIAS GOURAV VIJ — 394/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLWT010026922026
Filing Number
876/2026
Filing Date
28-Feb-2026
Registration No
394/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
138-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
378
Police Station
Hari Nagar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. xyz
Respondent(s)
-
1.GAURAV VIJ ALIAS GOURAV VIJ
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Bail Application No. 394/2026 The court granted regular bail to Gaurav Vij, accused of chain-snatching under Section 304(2) BNS. The court found that while the allegations are serious, investigation was complete with charge sheet filed, the offence is magistrate-triable and compoundable, the accused's identification parade failed, and three months' custody was sufficient. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with strict conditions including mandatory court appearances, no witness contact, and address disclosure to authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 394/2026
Case Summary: Bail Application No. 394/2026 The court granted regular bail to Gaurav Vij, accused of chain-snatching under Section 304(2) BNS. The court found that while the allegations are serious, investigation was complete with charge sheet filed, the offence is magistrate-triable and compoundable, the accused's identification parade failed, and three months' custody was sufficient. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with strict conditions including mandatory court appearances, no witness contact, and address disclosure to authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts