STATE vs SAURAV MAKHIJA — 342/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303/317(2)/3(5)/61(2)/111. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLWT010023862026

Filing Number

776/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

342/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC

Judge

156-Special Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

33728

Police Station

Anand Parbat

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303/317(2)/3(5)/61(2)/111

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. xyz

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAURAV MAKHIJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: STATE v. SAURAV MAKHIJA (342/2026) The court dismissed Saurav Makhija's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS, finding that despite interim protection and court directions, he deliberately failed to join investigation twice when called by the IO. The court held that his non-compliance with court orders and the serious nature of allegations against him precluded anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Special Judge

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Special Judge

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  9. 03-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Special Judge

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    For Bail

    Special Judge

  12. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  13. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 342/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STATE v. SAURAV MAKHIJA (342/2026) The court dismissed Saurav Makhija's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS, finding that despite interim protection and court directions, he deliberately failed to join investigation twice when called by the IO. The court held that his non-compliance with court orders and the serious nature of allegations against him precluded anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case