STATE vs GAURAV VIJ — 341/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 20th March 2026.
Bail Matters
CNR: DLWT010023822026
Filing Number
774/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
341/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
138-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
20-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
80105250
Police Station
Hari Nagar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Adv. xyz
Respondent(s)
-
1.GAURAV VIJ
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
The court granted regular bail to Gaurav Vij, accused of chain snatching under Section 303(2) BNS, after he spent over two months in judicial custody. The court noted that while the allegations were serious and the complainant successfully identified him in TIP proceedings, the investigation was complete, the charge sheet filed, and the offense was a compoundable Magistrate-triable offense; extended pre-trial detention served no purpose given the lengthy trial timeline ahead. Bail was granted on a Rs. 10,000 bond with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no witness contact, and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
For Bail
Additional Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 341/2026
The court granted regular bail to Gaurav Vij, accused of chain snatching under Section 303(2) BNS, after he spent over two months in judicial custody. The court noted that while the allegations were serious and the complainant successfully identified him in TIP proceedings, the investigation was complete, the charge sheet filed, and the offense was a compoundable Magistrate-triable offense; extended pre-trial detention served no purpose given the lengthy trial timeline ahead. Bail was granted on a Rs. 10,000 bond with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no witness contact, and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts