STATE vs GAURAV VIJ — 341/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 20th March 2026.

Bail Matters

CNR: DLWT010023822026

Case disposed

Filing Number

774/2026

Filing Date

21-02-2026

Registration No

341/2026

Registration Date

21-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC

Judge

138-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

80105250

Police Station

Hari Nagar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Adv. xyz

Respondent(s)

GAURAV VIJ

Hearing History

Judge: 138-Additional Sessions Judge

20-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

For Bail

11-03-2026

For Bail

03-03-2026

For Bail

23-02-2026

For Bail

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER

The court granted regular bail to Gaurav Vij, accused of chain snatching under Section 303(2) BNS, after he spent over two months in judicial custody. The court noted that while the allegations were serious and the complainant successfully identified him in TIP proceedings, the investigation was complete, the charge sheet filed, and the offense was a compoundable Magistrate-triable offense; extended pre-trial detention served no purpose given the lengthy trial timeline ahead. Bail was granted on a Rs. 10,000 bond with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no witness contact, and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to Gaurav Vij, accused of chain snatching under Section 303(2) BNS, after he spent over two months in judicial custody. The court noted that while the allegations were serious and the complainant successfully identified him in TIP proceedings, the investigation was complete, the charge sheet filed, and the offense was a compoundable Magistrate-triable offense; extended pre-trial detention served no purpose given the lengthy trial timeline ahead. Bail was granted on a Rs. 10,000 bond with strict conditions including mandatory court attendance, no witness contact, and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case