STATE vs SAHIL KADYAN — 172/2021
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 20,23,25,29. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 14th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: DLWT010014282021
Filing Number
743/2021
Filing Date
16-Feb-2021
Registration No
172/2021
Registration Date
26-Feb-2021
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
156-Special Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
317
Police Station
Crime Branch-West Delhi
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SAHIL KADYAN
-
2.RIDHAM GULATI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: SC 172/2021, STATE v. SAHIL KADYAN & RIDHAM GULATI Court Decision: ACQUITTAL Key Reasoning: The court acquitted both accused of NDPS charges (Section 20/23/25/29 NDPS Act & 468/471 IPC), primarily due to critical violations of Section 52A NDPS Act procedures. Samples were drawn by investigating officers at the seizure site rather than in a Magistrate's presence as mandated by law, rendering them inadmissible as primary evidence. Additionally, the court found multiple contradictions in prosecution witness testimonies regarding recovery details, parcel handling locations, and documentation procedures—creating reasonable doubt about guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Special Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Special Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Special Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
Statement of Accused
Special Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Statement of Accused
Special Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
14-Jan-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
14-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
24-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
15-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
27-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
30-Oct-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
30-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
27-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
11-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
26-Aug-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
07-Jul-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
07-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
02-Jun-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
02-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
13-May-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
09-Jan-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
09-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
18-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
10-Dec-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
10-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
12-Nov-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
12-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
30-Jul-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
30-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
15-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
04-Apr-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
01-Apr-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
21-Feb-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Special Judge
-
17-Feb-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
17-Feb-2024
For Bail
Special Judge
-
08-Jan-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
08-Jan-2024
For Bail
Special Judge
-
29-Aug-2023
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
29-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
13-Feb-2023
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
08-Dec-2022
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
08-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
24-Nov-2022
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
24-Nov-2022
Misc./ Appearance
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
15-Nov-2022
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
15-Nov-2022
Misc./ Appearance
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
26-Jul-2022
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
26-Jul-2022
Misc./ Appearance
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
23-May-2022
Charge
-
11-Apr-2022
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
11-Apr-2022
Charge
Special Judge
-
22-Feb-2022
Charge
Special Judge
-
10-Jan-2022
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
10-Jan-2022
Charge
Special Judge
-
27-Nov-2021
Charge
Special Judge
-
30-Oct-2021
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
30-Oct-2021
Charge
Special Judge
-
01-Sep-2021
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
01-Sep-2021
Charge
Special Judge
-
09-Jul-2021
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
09-Jul-2021
Misc./ Appearance
Special Judge
-
17-Jun-2021
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
17-Jun-2021
Misc./ Appearance
Special Judge
-
20-May-2021
Misc./ Appearance
Special Judge
-
31-Mar-2021
Misc./ Appearance
Special Judge
-
15-Mar-2021
Misc./ Appearance
Special Judge
-
26-Feb-2021
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
26-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 172/2021
Case Summary: SC 172/2021, STATE v. SAHIL KADYAN & RIDHAM GULATI Court Decision: ACQUITTAL Key Reasoning: The court acquitted both accused of NDPS charges (Section 20/23/25/29 NDPS Act & 468/471 IPC), primarily due to critical violations of Section 52A NDPS Act procedures. Samples were drawn by investigating officers at the seizure site rather than in a Magistrate's presence as mandated by law, rendering them inadmissible as primary evidence. Additionally, the court found multiple contradictions in prosecution witness testimonies regarding recovery details, parcel handling locations, and documentation procedures—creating reasonable doubt about guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts