SHRI RAM FINANCE LTD vs DITTEN BAKSHI — 37/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1940 Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

ARBTN - ARBRITRATION CASES

CNR: DLWT010013782026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-01-2026

Filing Number

949/2026

Filing Date

29-01-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC

Judge

201-District Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1940 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

SHRI RAM FINANCE LTD

Adv. Manoj Kumar

Respondent(s)

DITTEN BAKSHI

Hearing History

Judge: 201-District Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

21-02-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

05-02-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

30-01-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

The court granted Shriram Finance Limited's petition for appointment of a receiver to repossess a Mahendra Bolero vehicle from respondent Ditten Bakshi, finding a prima-facie case based on the respondent's default of Rs.1,29,488 on a vehicle loan and risk of disposal. The court appointed Mr. Rohit Rajput as receiver with detailed instructions for safe repossession, including photographs and inventory documentation, while permitting release if pending installments are cleared, and directed the petitioner to initiate arbitration within 15 days or face vacation of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted Shriram Finance Limited's petition for appointment of a receiver to repossess a Mahendra Bolero vehicle from respondent Ditten Bakshi, finding a prima-facie case based on the respondent's default of Rs.1,29,488 on a vehicle loan and risk of disposal. The court appointed Mr. Rohit Rajput as receiver with detailed instructions for safe repossession, including photographs and inventory documentation, while permitting release if pending installments are cleared, and directed the petitioner to initiate arbitration within 15 days or face vacation of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case