SHRI RAM FINANCE LTD vs DITTEN BAKSHI — 37/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1940 Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
ARBTN - ARBRITRATION CASES
CNR: DLWT010013782026
e-Filing Number
28-01-2026
Filing Number
949/2026
Filing Date
29-01-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
201-District Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI RAM FINANCE LTD
Adv. Manoj Kumar
Respondent(s)
DITTEN BAKSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 201-District Judge
Disposed
Misc. cases/purpose
Misc. cases/purpose
Misc. cases/purpose
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-02-2026 | Misc. cases/purpose |
| 05-02-2026 | Misc. cases/purpose |
| 30-01-2026 | Misc. cases/purpose |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted Shriram Finance Limited's petition for appointment of a receiver to repossess a Mahendra Bolero vehicle from respondent Ditten Bakshi, finding a prima-facie case based on the respondent's default of Rs.1,29,488 on a vehicle loan and risk of disposal. The court appointed Mr. Rohit Rajput as receiver with detailed instructions for safe repossession, including photographs and inventory documentation, while permitting release if pending installments are cleared, and directed the petitioner to initiate arbitration within 15 days or face vacation of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court granted Shriram Finance Limited's petition for appointment of a receiver to repossess a Mahendra Bolero vehicle from respondent Ditten Bakshi, finding a prima-facie case based on the respondent's default of Rs.1,29,488 on a vehicle loan and risk of disposal. The court appointed Mr. Rohit Rajput as receiver with detailed instructions for safe repossession, including photographs and inventory documentation, while permitting release if pending installments are cleared, and directed the petitioner to initiate arbitration within 15 days or face vacation of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts