SHRI RAM FINANCE LIMITED vs KANHAIYA PRASAD — 36/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1940 Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

ARBTN - ARBRITRATION CASES

CNR: DLWT010013672026

e-Filing Number

28-01-2026

Filing Number

947/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

36/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, West, THC

Judge

201-District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1940 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI RAM FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. Manoj Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANHAIYA PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    The court granted Shriram Finance Limited's petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing a receiver to repossess a Maruti Wagon R vehicle from defaulter Kanhaiya Prasad. The respondent had defaulted on EMI payments under a loan-cum-hypothecation agreement and owed Rs. 81,828, prompting the court to find a prima-facie case for vehicle repossession with detailed safeguards including photographic documentation and police assistance if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 36/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted Shriram Finance Limited's petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing a receiver to repossess a Maruti Wagon R vehicle from defaulter Kanhaiya Prasad. The respondent had defaulted on EMI payments under a loan-cum-hypothecation agreement and owed Rs. 81,828, prompting the court to find a prima-facie case for vehicle repossession with detailed safeguards including photographic documentation and police assistance if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case