SHER SINGH vs INDER SINGH — 201127/2014
Case under Civil Cases Section 14. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th April 2026.
Civ DJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLWT010000541997
Filing Number
40302/1997
Filing Date
24-11-1997
Registration No
201127/2014
Registration Date
24-11-1997
Court
District and Sessions Judge, West, THC
Judge
201-District Judge
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHER SINGH
Adv. adv
JAI SINGH
Respondent(s)
INDER SINGH
INDER SINGH
SHASHI SINGH
VIDYA WATI
CHANDER PAL
Hearing History
Judge: 201-District Judge
Disposed
Final Arguments
Final Arguments
Final Arguments
Final Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-04-2026 | Final Arguments |
| 11-04-2026 | Final Arguments |
| 04-04-2026 | Final Arguments |
| 02-04-2026 | Final Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sher Singh v. Inder Singh (201127/2014) The court decided issues 2 and 5 regarding a partnership dispute over agricultural land in Village Bharthal, New Delhi. Although the land was formally purchased in the partnership firm's name in 1985 for Rs. 55,000, the court held that it was the exclusive personal property of defendant no. 2 (Shashi Singh) because she alone funded the property's acquisition (Rs. 10,000 initial payment and Rs. 45,000 balance), pursued the specific performance lawsuit, and made all related court expenditures. Since the land was the only partnership asset and belonged exclusively to defendant no. 2, the plaintiffs were denied relief and not entitled to firm accounts. Issues 2 and 5 were decided in favor of defendants 2-4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sher Singh v. Inder Singh (201127/2014) The court decided issues 2 and 5 regarding a partnership dispute over agricultural land in Village Bharthal, New Delhi. Although the land was formally purchased in the partnership firm's name in 1985 for Rs. 55,000, the court held that it was the exclusive personal property of defendant no. 2 (Shashi Singh) because she alone funded the property's acquisition (Rs. 10,000 initial payment and Rs. 45,000 balance), pursued the specific performance lawsuit, and made all related court expenditures. Since the land was the only partnership asset and belonged exclusively to defendant no. 2, the plaintiffs were denied relief and not entitled to firm accounts. Issues 2 and 5 were decided in favor of defendants 2-4. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts