SATINDER KUMAR vs RAM CHANDER PANDEY AND ORS. — 225/2018

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

MISC DJ ADJ - MISC CASES FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLSW010114932018

Filing Number

8533/2018

Filing Date

01-Jun-2018

Registration No

225/2018

Registration Date

04-Jun-2018

Court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK

Judge

438-Presiding Officer-MACT-01

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATINDER KUMAR

    Adv. VARUN KHERA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM CHANDER PANDEY AND ORS.

  2. 2.SURESH WASSON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    The MACT court dismissed the miscellaneous application, holding that Vikram Singh shall not be treated as a party to the main claim petition (307/09) since both sides acknowledged that Suresh Wasan was the actual registered owner and insured party, and Vikram Singh's name was wrongly mentioned. The insurance company was granted liberty to initiate action against the true registered owner, Suresh Wasan, as permitted by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 20-Dec-2025

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  10. 17-Oct-2025

    Order

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  11. 08-Aug-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  12. 08-Aug-2025

    Order

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  13. 06-Jun-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  14. 06-Jun-2025

    Order

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  15. 04-Apr-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  16. 04-Apr-2025

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  17. 06-Feb-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  18. 06-Feb-2025

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  19. 20-Dec-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  20. 20-Dec-2024

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  21. 13-Aug-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  22. 13-Aug-2024

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  23. 12-Jul-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  24. 12-Jul-2024

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  25. 03-Apr-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  26. 03-Apr-2024

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  27. 07-Feb-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  28. 07-Feb-2024

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  29. 17-Nov-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  30. 17-Nov-2023

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  31. 25-Aug-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  32. 25-Aug-2023

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  33. 02-Jun-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  34. 02-Jun-2023

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  35. 12-Apr-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  36. 12-Apr-2023

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  37. 25-Nov-2022

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  38. 25-Nov-2022

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  39. 02-Sep-2022

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  40. 02-Sep-2022

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  41. 27-May-2022

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  42. 27-May-2022

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  43. 02-Mar-2022

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  44. 02-Mar-2022

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  45. 13-Dec-2021

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  46. 13-Dec-2021

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  47. 10-Nov-2021

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  48. 10-Nov-2021

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  49. 01-Oct-2021

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  50. 01-Oct-2021

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  51. 30-Apr-2021

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  52. 30-Apr-2021

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  53. 26-Oct-2020

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  54. 26-Oct-2020

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  55. 06-Jul-2020

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  56. 06-Jul-2020

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  57. 19-May-2020

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  58. 27-Mar-2020

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  59. 20-Dec-2019

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  60. 27-Sep-2019

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  61. 27-Sep-2019

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  62. 17-May-2019

    Misc. Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  63. 15-Feb-2019

    Misc./ Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  64. 02-Nov-2018

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  65. 02-Nov-2018

    Misc./ Arguments

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  66. 03-Aug-2018

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  67. 04-Jun-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  68. 01-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 225/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The MACT court dismissed the miscellaneous application, holding that Vikram Singh shall not be treated as a party to the main claim petition (307/09) since both sides acknowledged that Suresh Wasan was the actual registered owner and insured party, and Vikram Singh's name was wrongly mentioned. The insurance company was granted liberty to initiate action against the true registered owner, Suresh Wasan, as permitted by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case