DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE vs RAHUL SHOKEEN AND OTHERS — 889/2023

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLSW010099402023

Filing Number

4254/2023

Filing Date

12-Oct-2023

Registration No

889/2023

Registration Date

13-Oct-2023

Court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK

Judge

438-Presiding Officer-MACT-01

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

    Adv. ARVIND GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL SHOKEEN AND OTHERS

  2. 2.JITENDER SINGH

  3. 3.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  3. 22-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

    The MACT court hearing scheduled for 14.03.2026 resulted in no substantive decision on the merits. The court noted the Lok Adalat proceeding was postponed by the District Legal Services Authority and accordingly adjourned the case to 22.03.2026 for Lok Adalat (alternative dispute resolution) proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  8. 14-Jan-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  9. 19-Nov-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  10. 19-Nov-2025

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  11. 08-Aug-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  12. 08-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  13. 07-May-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  14. 07-May-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  15. 30-Apr-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  16. 30-Apr-2025

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  17. 19-Feb-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  18. 19-Feb-2025

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  19. 13-Dec-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  20. 13-Dec-2024

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  21. 06-Dec-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  22. 06-Dec-2024

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  23. 06-Nov-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  24. 06-Nov-2024

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  25. 21-Aug-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  26. 21-Aug-2024

    Issues

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  27. 30-May-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  28. 30-May-2024

    Issues

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  29. 28-Feb-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  30. 28-Feb-2024

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  31. 22-Dec-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  32. 22-Dec-2023

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  33. 14-Dec-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  34. 14-Dec-2023

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  35. 02-Dec-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  36. 02-Dec-2023

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  37. 03-Nov-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  38. 03-Nov-2023

    Misc./ Appearance

    Presiding Officer-MACT-01

  39. 13-Oct-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  40. 13-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 12-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 889/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The MACT court hearing scheduled for 14.03.2026 resulted in no substantive decision on the merits. The court noted the Lok Adalat proceeding was postponed by the District Legal Services Authority and accordingly adjourned the case to 22.03.2026 for Lok Adalat (alternative dispute resolution) proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case