JAKESH KUMAR vs JAGDISH RAJ AND OTHERS — 888/2022
Case under Specific Performance of Contracts Section 1. Status: Order. Next hearing: 24th August 2026.
CS DJ ADJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLSW010095532022
Next Hearing
24th August 2026
Filing Number
4086/2022
Filing Date
13-09-2022
Registration No
888/2022
Registration Date
14-09-2022
Court
District and Session Judge, South-West DWK
Judge
437-District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAKESH KUMAR
Adv. SANJEEV CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
JAGDISH RAJ AND OTHERS
SUMAN ARYA
SUNIL VERMA
DEVINDER KUMAR
KEWALKRISHAN
VISHAL CHAWLA
SH. BHUPINDER KUMAR VERMA
SUSHMA
Hearing History
Judge: 437-District Judge
Order
Order
Order
Misc. Arguments
Misc. Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Order |
| 09-04-2026 | Order |
| 14-03-2026 | Order |
| 02-03-2026 | Misc. Arguments |
| 15-12-2025 | Misc. Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case 888/2022 Summary JAKESH KUMAR v. JAGDISH RAJ AND OTHERS Defendants 4-8's application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC to reject the plaint was dismissed. The court found the plaint discloses a valid cause of action: Jakesh Kumar entered a registered agreement to sell in 2005 for a DDA flat in Bindapur, paid Rs.60,000, and was put in possession until 2019 when defendants dispossessed him. The court rejected arguments regarding limitation, missing site plan, and lack of cause of action as premature, holding these are mixed questions of law and fact to be determined at trial. Case adjourned to 24.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 888/2022 Summary JAKESH KUMAR v. JAGDISH RAJ AND OTHERS Defendants 4-8's application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC to reject the plaint was dismissed. The court found the plaint discloses a valid cause of action: Jakesh Kumar entered a registered agreement to sell in 2005 for a DDA flat in Bindapur, paid Rs.60,000, and was put in possession until 2019 when defendants dispossessed him. The court rejected arguments regarding limitation, missing site plan, and lack of cause of action as premature, holding these are mixed questions of law and fact to be determined at trial. Case adjourned to 24.08.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts