M/S HDFC BANK LTD. vs SADDAM HUSSAIN — 549/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CR CRIMINAL REVISION - CRIMINAL REVISION
CNR: DLSW010090382025
e-Filing Number
16-09-2025
Filing Number
4836/2025
Filing Date
18-09-2025
Registration No
549/2025
Registration Date
19-09-2025
Court
District and Session Judge, South-West DWK
Judge
435-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S HDFC BANK LTD.
Adv. Praveen Solanki
Respondent(s)
SADDAM HUSSAIN
Hearing History
Judge: 435-Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
Misc./ Appearance
Misc./ Appearance
Misc./ Appearance
Misc./ Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Misc./ Appearance |
| 16-02-2026 | Misc./ Appearance |
| 17-12-2025 | Misc./ Appearance |
| 04-10-2025 | Misc./ Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: HDFC Bank Ltd. v. Saddam Hussain (CR 549/2025) The Additional Sessions Judge set aside the trial court's dismissal of HDFC Bank's cheque dishonor complaint (₹10,629) against Saddam Hussain for non-filing of prosecution form (PF), finding the dismissal was on technical grounds without affording the bank a reasonable opportunity to file the PF receipt. The court allowed the revision petition subject to HDFC Bank paying ₹1,000 cost to DLSA and previous costs imposed, with the case remitted for trial on merits, emphasizing that matters should be disposed on substance rather than procedural technicalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: HDFC Bank Ltd. v. Saddam Hussain (CR 549/2025) The Additional Sessions Judge set aside the trial court's dismissal of HDFC Bank's cheque dishonor complaint (₹10,629) against Saddam Hussain for non-filing of prosecution form (PF), finding the dismissal was on technical grounds without affording the bank a reasonable opportunity to file the PF receipt. The court allowed the revision petition subject to HDFC Bank paying ₹1,000 cost to DLSA and previous costs imposed, with the case remitted for trial on merits, emphasizing that matters should be disposed on substance rather than procedural technicalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts