STATE vs ANIL RAWAT — 959/2026

Case under Delhi Excise Act, Manufacturer and Import and Export Transport Intoxicant 33 a Section 33,58. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLSW010078442026

Filing Number

4389/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

959/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK

Judge

765-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

Kapashera

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Delhi Excise Act, Manufacturer and Import and Export Transport Intoxicant 33 a Section 33,58
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 111

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANIL RAWAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

    Case Summary: State v. Anil Rawat (SC 959/2026) The court granted regular bail to accused Anil Rawat in an illicit liquor trafficking case under the Delhi Excise Act and BNS 2023. The court found that while the applicant was allegedly involved in transporting illicit liquor from Gurugram to Delhi on 04.01.2026, he was not apprehended at the spot and no recovery was made from his possession; the case relied primarily on co-accused disclosures. Since similarly-situated co-accused persons had already been granted bail, the court admitted Rawat to regular bail on a personal bond of Rs. 30,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 959/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Anil Rawat (SC 959/2026) The court granted regular bail to accused Anil Rawat in an illicit liquor trafficking case under the Delhi Excise Act and BNS 2023. The court found that while the applicant was allegedly involved in transporting illicit liquor from Gurugram to Delhi on 04.01.2026, he was not apprehended at the spot and no recovery was made from his possession; the case relied primarily on co-accused disclosures. Since similarly-situated co-accused persons had already been granted bail, the court admitted Rawat to regular bail on a personal bond of Rs. 30,000 with one surety of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case