ARCHANA SHARMA vs SHIV KUMAR SHARMA — 754/2024
Case under Recovery of Money Section 74. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 30th March 2026.
CS DJ ADJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLSW010077172024
e-Filing Number
09-08-2024
Filing Number
3850/2024
Filing Date
14-08-2024
Registration No
754/2024
Registration Date
16-08-2024
Court
District and Session Judge, South-West DWK
Judge
424-District Judge
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARCHANA SHARMA
Adv. SANDEEP KUMAR
Respondent(s)
SHIV KUMAR SHARMA
Hearing History
Judge: 424-District Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-03-2026 | Order |
| 14-03-2026 | Order |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 31-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 754/2024 Summary: Archana Sharma v. Shiv Kumar Sharma The Delhi court decreed the plaintiff's suit for Rs. 7,00,000 in a friendly loan recovery case. The defendant borrowed Rs. 7,00,000 from the plaintiff between January-May 2019 for school development, issued two post-dated cheques in August 2021 that were dishonored for insufficient funds, and acknowledged the debt via a signed undertaking—but failed to provide any viable defense. The court dismissed the defendant's leave-to-defend application, finding no triable issues and relying on the presumption that cheque issuance admits liability, awarding judgment with 6% interest and costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 754/2024 Summary: Archana Sharma v. Shiv Kumar Sharma The Delhi court decreed the plaintiff's suit for Rs. 7,00,000 in a friendly loan recovery case. The defendant borrowed Rs. 7,00,000 from the plaintiff between January-May 2019 for school development, issued two post-dated cheques in August 2021 that were dishonored for insufficient funds, and acknowledged the debt via a signed undertaking—but failed to provide any viable defense. The court dismissed the defendant's leave-to-defend application, finding no triable issues and relying on the presumption that cheque issuance admits liability, awarding judgment with 6% interest and costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts