STATE vs ROHAN CHAUHAN — 922/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLSW010074392026

Filing Number

4224/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

922/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK

Judge

760-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

733

Police Station

Palam village

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROHAN CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Copy Of Order

    Case 922/2026 Summary: The court granted bail to Rohan Chauhan in a robbery case (FIR 733/2025) under BNS sections 309(4)/317(2)/3(5). Although the prosecution argued the offense was serious and recovery of stolen aerodrome entry permit and clothes from the accused proved guilt, the court found the TIP identification procedure compromised (photos shown before proceedings) and noted the complainant had been examined and lengthy trial awaited. The court ordered bail on personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety of equal amount, applying the principle that bail, not jail, is the general rule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 20-May-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  5. 20-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 922/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 922/2026 Summary: The court granted bail to Rohan Chauhan in a robbery case (FIR 733/2025) under BNS sections 309(4)/317(2)/3(5). Although the prosecution argued the offense was serious and recovery of stolen aerodrome entry permit and clothes from the accused proved guilt, the court found the TIP identification procedure compromised (photos shown before proceedings) and noted the complainant had been examined and lengthy trial awaited. The court ordered bail on personal bond of Rs. 20,000 with one surety of equal amount, applying the principle that bail, not jail, is the general rule. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case