STATE vs NAJAKAT ALI — 227/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506,308,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd July 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: DLSW010051372026
Filing Number
1762/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
227/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, South-West DWK
Judge
766-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
02-Jul-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 18-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
174
Police Station
Nazafgarh
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAJAKAT ALI
-
2.PAWAN KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jul-2026
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
02-Jul-2026
Copy Of Judgment
Case Summary: State v. Najakat Ali & Pawan Kumar (227/2026) The court acquitted accused Pawan Kumar of charges under Section 308/34 IPC (act causing hurt with knowledge it may cause death) because the complainant, who was the sole eyewitness, failed to identify him and testified that Pawan was not involved in the incident. The prosecution's case collapsed when the complainant deposed he could not see the accused's faces during the alleged assault and specifically stated in cross-examination that he saw Pawan for the first time in court. With no incriminating evidence on record, the court closed the prosecution's case and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jul-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2026
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
26-May-2026
Order
Additional Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
10-Apr-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Additional Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 227/2026
Case Summary: State v. Najakat Ali & Pawan Kumar (227/2026) The court acquitted accused Pawan Kumar of charges under Section 308/34 IPC (act causing hurt with knowledge it may cause death) because the complainant, who was the sole eyewitness, failed to identify him and testified that Pawan was not involved in the incident. The prosecution's case collapsed when the complainant deposed he could not see the accused's faces during the alleged assault and specifically stated in cross-examination that he saw Pawan for the first time in court. With no incriminating evidence on record, the court closed the prosecution's case and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts