VIRENDER KUMAR vs NARENDER KUMAR AND ANR — 398/2022

Case under Partition Section 151. Status: Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.

Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence Next hearing 13-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CS DJ ADJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLSW010044972022

Filing Number

1983/2022

Filing Date

07-May-2022

Registration No

398/2022

Registration Date

09-May-2022

Court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK

Judge

424-District Judge

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Partition Section 151
Possession and Permanent Injuction

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIRENDER KUMAR

    Adv. NAVEEN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARENDER KUMAR AND ANR

  2. 2.SMT. SAROJ CHOPRA

Case History

  1. 13-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

    Case Summary: 398/2022 On 20.03.2026, the court partially cross-examined Defendant 1 (DW1), a CRPF employee posted in Jammu, who requested adjournment until July due to difficulty obtaining leave. The court adjourned the remaining cross-examination to 13.07.2026 with both parties' consent. Defendant 2 (Smt. Saroj) was issued a warning for using unparliamentary language in court; the judge cautioned that repetition would result in strict legal action. Plaintiff's counsel was advised to counsel his client on courtroom decorum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  10. 27-Sep-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  11. 27-Sep-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  12. 02-Aug-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  13. 02-Aug-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  14. 10-Jul-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  15. 10-Jul-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  16. 03-May-2025

    Copy Of Order

  17. 03-May-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  18. 13-Feb-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  19. 13-Feb-2025

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  20. 04-Jan-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  21. 04-Jan-2025

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  22. 09-Sep-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  23. 09-Sep-2024

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  24. 18-Jul-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  25. 18-Jul-2024

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  26. 30-May-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  27. 30-May-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  28. 11-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  29. 24-Nov-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  30. 24-Nov-2023

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  31. 27-Jul-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  32. 27-Jul-2023

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  33. 08-Feb-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  34. 08-Feb-2023

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  35. 13-Sep-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  36. 13-Sep-2022

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  37. 02-Jun-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  38. 02-Jun-2022

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Additional District Judge

  39. 09-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 07-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 398/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 398/2022 On 20.03.2026, the court partially cross-examined Defendant 1 (DW1), a CRPF employee posted in Jammu, who requested adjournment until July due to difficulty obtaining leave. The court adjourned the remaining cross-examination to 13.07.2026 with both parties' consent. Defendant 2 (Smt. Saroj) was issued a warning for using unparliamentary language in court; the judge cautioned that repetition would result in strict legal action. Plaintiff's counsel was advised to counsel his client on courtroom decorum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case