SATBIR SINGH vs ANURADHA KUMAR — 456/2025

Case under Recovery of Money Section order37. Status: Misc./ Appearance. Next hearing: 22nd August 2026.

CS DJ ADJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLSW010039412025

Misc./ Appearance

Next Hearing

22nd August 2026

e-Filing Number

03-05-2025

Filing Number

1892/2025

Filing Date

05-05-2025

Registration No

456/2025

Registration Date

07-05-2025

Court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK

Judge

424-District Judge

Acts & Sections

Recovery of Money Section order37

Petitioner(s)

SATBIR SINGH

Adv. Prince

Respondent(s)

ANURADHA KUMAR

RAJESH KUMAR

HEMANT KUMAR

MANASWANI

MOHD SHAMIM

Hearing History

Judge: 424-District Judge

02-06-2026

Misc./ Appearance

24-03-2026

Order

19-03-2026

Order

14-03-2026

Order

12-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

24-03-2026
COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Case Summary: 456/2025 Outcome: All five applications filed by defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC have been dismissed. Satbir Singh sued five defendants (Anuradha Kumar, Rajesh Kumar, Hemant Kumar, and two others) for Rs. 35 lacs, alleging cheating and misappropriation of funds from their joint homestay business "The Orchard." Defendants argued the dispute should be referred to arbitration per an arbitration clause in the partnership deed and that non-signatory defendants cannot be parties. The court ruled the suit involves cheating/breach of trust claims lying outside the arbitration agreement's scope and implicates non-parties to the deed, rendering arbitration referral inapplicable. The case is listed for further proceedings on 02.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 456/2025 Outcome: All five applications filed by defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC have been dismissed. Satbir Singh sued five defendants (Anuradha Kumar, Rajesh Kumar, Hemant Kumar, and two others) for Rs. 35 lacs, alleging cheating and misappropriation of funds from their joint homestay business "The Orchard." Defendants argued the dispute should be referred to arbitration per an arbitration clause in the partnership deed and that non-signatory defendants cannot be parties. The court ruled the suit involves cheating/breach of trust claims lying outside the arbitration agreement's scope and implicates non-parties to the deed, rendering arbitration referral inapplicable. The case is listed for further proceedings on 02.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case