STATE vs MANISHA PASWAN — 408/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLSW010035142026

Filing Number

1216/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

408/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK

Judge

435-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

111

Police Station

Dabri

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANISHA PASWAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case 408/2026 Summary: The Delhi court dismissed Manisha Paswan's anticipatory bail application in an online fraud case involving ₹1,50,000 siphoned from a complainant's bank account. The court found serious allegations against her—cheating and criminal conspiracy under BNS sections 318(4)/3(5)—noting she received ₹2,000 in criminal proceeds and her account was used as the beneficiary account. The court rejected bail, determining the investigation was at a nascent stage, custodial interrogation was necessary to recover digital evidence and identify conspirators, and granting bail would impede investigation and send a wrong signal against rising cyber-fraud offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 408/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 408/2026 Summary: The Delhi court dismissed Manisha Paswan's anticipatory bail application in an online fraud case involving ₹1,50,000 siphoned from a complainant's bank account. The court found serious allegations against her—cheating and criminal conspiracy under BNS sections 318(4)/3(5)—noting she received ₹2,000 in criminal proceeds and her account was used as the beneficiary account. The court rejected bail, determining the investigation was at a nascent stage, custodial interrogation was necessary to recover digital evidence and identify conspirators, and granting bail would impede investigation and send a wrong signal against rising cyber-fraud offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case