SANJOGITA AGARWAL vs MAHESH KUMAR — 376/2025
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section Order 4. Status: Misc./ Appearance. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CS DJ ADJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLSW010032872025
e-Filing Number
10-04-2025
Filing Number
1591/2025
Filing Date
16-Apr-2025
Registration No
376/2025
Registration Date
17-Apr-2025
Court
District and Session Judge, South-West DWK
Judge
424-District Judge
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJOGITA AGARWAL
Adv. Naveen Kumar
-
2.Bhwan Agarwal
Adv. Naveen Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHESH KUMAR
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
Case 376/2025 Summary: The Delhi District Court (Dwarka) allowed the plaintiffs' application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to amend the plaint by correcting technical errors, including: substituting Plaintiff No. 2's affidavit (which inadvertently referenced "Application" instead of "Plaint"), rectifying a Section 63(4)(c) Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 certificate, and correcting verifications of both plaintiffs. The court found these were bona fide corrections of inadvertent errors that did not alter the suit's nature. Arguments on the remaining applications under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and Section 151 CPC are scheduled for 17.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Misc./ Appearance
District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Arguments
District Judge
-
28-Oct-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
28-Oct-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
Arguments
District Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
17-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 376/2025
Case 376/2025 Summary: The Delhi District Court (Dwarka) allowed the plaintiffs' application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to amend the plaint by correcting technical errors, including: substituting Plaintiff No. 2's affidavit (which inadvertently referenced "Application" instead of "Plaint"), rectifying a Section 63(4)(c) Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 certificate, and correcting verifications of both plaintiffs. The court found these were bona fide corrections of inadvertent errors that did not alter the suit's nature. Arguments on the remaining applications under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and Section 151 CPC are scheduled for 17.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts