BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD vs SARASWATI W/O VIJENDER — 400/2024
Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 14th March 2026.
Ct. Cases - COMPLAINT CASES
CNR: DLSW010028532024
Filing Number
1587/2024
Filing Date
21-Mar-2024
Registration No
400/2024
Registration Date
22-Mar-2024
Court
District and Session Judge, South-West DWK
Judge
422-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
Last updated 08-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Baba Haridas Nagar
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD
Adv. AKSHAY MITTAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.SARASWATI W/O VIJENDER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
Case 400/2024 Summary: The Special Electricity Court dismissed BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd's case against Saraswati W/O Vijender as withdrawn, after a verification report confirmed the accused had vacated the address and sold the disputed premises. The court granted the complainant liberty to file a fresh complaint against the accused based on the same theft bill once she is traced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
15-Sep-2025
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2025
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
26-May-2025
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2025
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
03-Feb-2025
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
03-Oct-2024
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge
-
22-Jul-2024
Pre-Summning Evidence
Additional Sessions Judge
-
22-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 400/2024
Case 400/2024 Summary: The Special Electricity Court dismissed BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd's case against Saraswati W/O Vijender as withdrawn, after a verification report confirmed the accused had vacated the address and sold the disputed premises. The court granted the complainant liberty to file a fresh complaint against the accused based on the same theft bill once she is traced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts