AMRISH KUMAR vs KIRAN YADAV — 320/2025

Case under Permanent Injuction Section ORDERIV. Status: Misc. cases/purpose. Next hearing: 22nd August 2026.

CS DJ ADJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLSW010027702025

Misc. cases/purpose

Next Hearing

22nd August 2026

e-Filing Number

28-03-2025

Filing Number

1347/2025

Filing Date

29-03-2025

Registration No

320/2025

Registration Date

01-04-2025

Court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK

Judge

424-District Judge

Acts & Sections

Permanent Injuction Section ORDERIV

Petitioner(s)

AMRISH KUMAR

Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

KIRAN YADAV

FANISH SHAH

Hearing History

Judge: 424-District Judge

29-05-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

15-03-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

24-01-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

27-09-2025

Misc. cases/purpose

05-07-2025

Misc. Arguments

Interim Orders

24-01-2026
COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Summary: Amrish Kumar v. Kiran Yadav (Case 320/2025) Outcome: The court dismissed Defendant No. 1's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on grounds of lack of cause of action, jurisdictional bar under the Family Courts Act, and limitation. The court also allowed the plaintiff's application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to amend the plaint's valuation and relief clauses. The case involves a property dispute where the plaintiff (husband) challenges a gift deed executed to his wife, claiming it was a sham arrangement under a family settlement among three brothers to inherit their deceased father's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Amrish Kumar v. Kiran Yadav (Case 320/2025) Outcome: The court dismissed Defendant No. 1's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on grounds of lack of cause of action, jurisdictional bar under the Family Courts Act, and limitation. The court also allowed the plaintiff's application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to amend the plaint's valuation and relief clauses. The case involves a property dispute where the plaintiff (husband) challenges a gift deed executed to his wife, claiming it was a sham arrangement under a family settlement among three brothers to inherit their deceased father's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case