ANUP KUMAR JHA vs VEERMATI — 62/2024
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section 1908. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 04th June 2026.
EX CIVIL - EXECUTION CIVIL
CNR: DLSW010021342024
Filing Number
865/2024
Filing Date
01-Mar-2024
Registration No
62/2024
Registration Date
02-Mar-2024
Court
District and Session Judge, South-West DWK
Judge
437-District Judge
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANUP KUMAR JHA
Adv. PARAMVEER
Respondent(s)
-
1.VEERMATI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
The execution petition filed by Anup Kumar Jha (decree holder) against Veermati was dismissed for want of prosecution. The court found that the decree holder failed to comply with multiple orders to pay the Local Commissioner's fees (Rs. 8,000), despite the Local Commissioner having executed the commission at the correct property address in Mahavir Enclave, New Delhi, after an initial error due to a typographical mistake in the original judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
13-May-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-May-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
08-May-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
08-May-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
06-May-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
16-Jan-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
20-Dec-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
22-Aug-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
01-Aug-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
04-Jul-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
02-May-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
02-May-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
07-Mar-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
07-Mar-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Feb-2025
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
06-Feb-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
03-Feb-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
03-Feb-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
29-Nov-2024
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
22-Oct-2024
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
03-Sep-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
03-Sep-2024
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
31-May-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
31-May-2024
Misc. cases/purpose
District Judge
-
02-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 62/2024
The execution petition filed by Anup Kumar Jha (decree holder) against Veermati was dismissed for want of prosecution. The court found that the decree holder failed to comply with multiple orders to pay the Local Commissioner's fees (Rs. 8,000), despite the Local Commissioner having executed the commission at the correct property address in Mahavir Enclave, New Delhi, after an initial error due to a typographical mistake in the original judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts