BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD. vs GULISTA W/O TAJ — 164/2025

Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 135. Status: Misc./ Appearance. Next hearing: 24th September 2026.

Misc./ Appearance Next hearing 24-Sep-2026

Ct. Cases - COMPLAINT CASES

CNR: DLSW010010532025

Filing Number

581/2025

Filing Date

04-Feb-2025

Registration No

164/2025

Registration Date

06-Feb-2025

Court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK

Judge

422-Additional Sessions Judge

Last updated 08-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Uttam Nagar

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Indian Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD.

    Adv. STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GULISTA W/O TAJ

Case History

  1. 24-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    Case 164/2025 Summary: The Special Electricity Court (South West) in New Delhi heard BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. Gulista W/O Taj on 14.03.2026 (rescheduled from 02.03.2026 due to court holiday). The accused failed to appear despite repeated calls; however, no adverse orders were passed due to the original listing date. The court issued a notice to the accused and adjourned the matter to 24.09.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 16-Sep-2025

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 27-May-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 27-May-2025

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge

  8. 06-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 04-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 164/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 164/2025 Summary: The Special Electricity Court (South West) in New Delhi heard BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. Gulista W/O Taj on 14.03.2026 (rescheduled from 02.03.2026 due to court holiday). The accused failed to appear despite repeated calls; however, no adverse orders were passed due to the original listing date. The court issued a notice to the accused and adjourned the matter to 24.09.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case