AARTI vs NAVDEEP — 64/2026

Case under Recovery of Money Section 74. Disposed: Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CS DJ ADJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLSW010006752026

e-Filing Number

07-01-2026

Filing Number

424/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

64/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge, South-West DWK

Judge

437-District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Recovery of Money Section 74

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AARTI

    Adv. JAI DEV SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAVDEEP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the plaint filed by AARTI against NAVDEEP under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC because it was written on insufficiently stamped paper and the plaintiff failed to file the deficient court fee despite being given an opportunity. The plaintiff's absence on the hearing date further resulted in the dismissal of the case, with the file consigned to the Record Room. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the plaint filed by AARTI against NAVDEEP under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC because it was written on insufficiently stamped paper and the plaintiff failed to file the deficient court fee despite being given an opportunity. The plaintiff's absence on the hearing date further resulted in the dismissal of the case, with the file consigned to the Record Room. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case