AARTI vs NAVDEEP — 64/2026
Case under Recovery of Money Section 74. Disposed: Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED on 16th March 2026.
CS DJ ADJ - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLSW010006752026
e-Filing Number
07-01-2026
Filing Number
424/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
64/2026
Registration Date
19-01-2026
Court
District and Session Judge, South-West DWK
Judge
437-District Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLAINT RETURNED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AARTI
Adv. JAI DEV SHARMA
Respondent(s)
NAVDEEP
Hearing History
Judge: 437-District Judge
Disposed
Misc. cases/purpose
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-01-2026 | Misc. cases/purpose |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the plaint filed by AARTI against NAVDEEP under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC because it was written on insufficiently stamped paper and the plaintiff failed to file the deficient court fee despite being given an opportunity. The plaintiff's absence on the hearing date further resulted in the dismissal of the case, with the file consigned to the Record Room. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court rejected the plaint filed by AARTI against NAVDEEP under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC because it was written on insufficiently stamped paper and the plaintiff failed to file the deficient court fee despite being given an opportunity. The plaintiff's absence on the hearing date further resulted in the dismissal of the case, with the file consigned to the Record Room. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts