SANJIV KUMAR VASHIST vs The State (G.N.C.T of Delhi) — 98/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448&449. Status: Arguments (Criminal). Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
T.P. CRL - Transfer Application(CRL)
CNR: DLST010198742025
e-Filing Number
05-12-2025
Filing Number
5530/2025
Filing Date
05-Dec-2025
Registration No
98/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket
Judge
49-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJIV KUMAR VASHIST
Adv. GAURAV TOKAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State (G.N.C.T of Delhi)
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
Case Summary: TP CRL 98/2025 The case was adjourned to 02.07.2026 for arguments on the petitioner's application to take on record subsequent events/additional grounds and on a transfer application/petition. The petitioner sought to file copies of additional legal precedents referenced in his application. Respondent No. 2 was directed to file a reply within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Arguments (Criminal)
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments (Criminal)
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
23-Jan-2026
Misc. cases
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
24-Dec-2025
Misc. cases
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Copy Of Judicial Proceedings
-
08-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 98/2025
Case Summary: TP CRL 98/2025 The case was adjourned to 02.07.2026 for arguments on the petitioner's application to take on record subsequent events/additional grounds and on a transfer application/petition. The petitioner sought to file copies of additional legal precedents referenced in his application. Respondent No. 2 was directed to file a reply within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts