RAHUL GAMBHIR vs SAVITRI TAGEJA — 435/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPOUNDED on 29th April 2026.

CA - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: DLST010125042024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

21-10-2024

Filing Number

25774/2024

Filing Date

22-10-2024

Registration No

435/2024

Registration Date

23-10-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket

Judge

18-Special Judge

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPOUNDED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415

Petitioner(s)

RAHUL GAMBHIR

Adv. Rohit Taneja

Respondent(s)

SAVITRI TAGEJA

Hearing History

Judge: 18-Special Judge

29-04-2026

Disposed

24-04-2026

Misc./ Appearance (Criminal)

23-04-2026

Misc./ Appearance (Criminal)

09-04-2026

Misc. Arguments

13-03-2026

Misc. Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

29-04-2026
COPY OF ORDER

Summary of CA No. 435/24 The court approved an amicable settlement between appellant Rahul Gambhir and respondent Savitri Tageja in a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 case. The appellant agreed to pay Rs. 7.5 lakhs in five equal monthly instalments of Rs. 1.5 lakhs each, with the first instalment paid on 29.04.2026. The court compounded the offense subject to timely compliance, reserving the respondent's right to seek execution of the trial court's sentence order in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

23-10-2024
COPY OF ORDER
10-01-2025
COPY OF ORDER
12-02-2025
COPY OF ORDER
24-05-2025
COPY OF ORDER
11-08-2025
COPY OF ORDER
30-10-2025
COPY OF ORDER
17-12-2025
COPY OF ORDER
13-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
09-04-2026
COPY OF ORDER
23-04-2026
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CA No. 435/24 The court approved an amicable settlement between appellant Rahul Gambhir and respondent Savitri Tageja in a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 case. The appellant agreed to pay Rs. 7.5 lakhs in five equal monthly instalments of Rs. 1.5 lakhs each, with the first instalment paid on 29.04.2026. The court compounded the offense subject to timely compliance, reserving the respondent's right to seek execution of the trial court's sentence order in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case