Directorate of Revenue Intelligence vs Feroz Hasan Kutchi — 74/2026

Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc Crl - MISC. CASES

CNR: DLST010032962026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

1102/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

74/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket

Judge

18-Special Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Lodhi Colony

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 Section 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

    Adv. Adeel Ahmed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Feroz Hasan Kutchi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: DRI v. Feroz Hasan Kutchi (Misc. Crl. 74/26) The Special Judge granted DRI's application to further examine accused Feroz Hasan Kutchi and Iram Salim Khan under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, finding the investigation at a crucial stage. The court permitted DRI officials to conduct the examination on 26.03.2026 at Tihar Jail from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM, with authorization to carry departmental files, laptops, mobile phones, pendrives, and printers during the inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: DRI v. Feroz Hasan Kutchi (Misc. Crl. 74/26) The Special Judge granted DRI's application to further examine accused Feroz Hasan Kutchi and Iram Salim Khan under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, finding the investigation at a crucial stage. The court permitted DRI officials to conduct the examination on 26.03.2026 at Tihar Jail from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM, with authorization to carry departmental files, laptops, mobile phones, pendrives, and printers during the inquiry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case