ANKIT SACHDEVA vs STATE — 129/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr Rev - CRIMINAL REVISION

CNR: DLST010032782026

e-Filing Number

20-03-2026

Filing Number

1092/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

129/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, South , Saket

Judge

6-Additional Sessions Judge-02

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 30-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANKIT SACHDEVA

    Adv. GAURAV MEENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Order

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Order

    Case Summary: Ankit Sachdeva v. State (Cr. Rev. No. 129/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge allowed Sachdeva's revision petition, setting aside the trial court's order that denied release of Rs. 1,00,000 frozen in a bank account. The court found that since the complainant clarified the amount was inadvertently transferred to a colleague (not fraud), the investigation was closed via cancellation report, and both the investigating agency and State consented to release, continued freezing served no purpose and caused undue hardship. The court directed immediate unfreezing and return of the funds to the petitioner's account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge-02

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Misc./ Appearance (Criminal)

    Additional Sessions Judge-02

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Order

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Misc./ Appearance (Criminal)

    Additional Sessions Judge-02

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Order

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 129/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ankit Sachdeva v. State (Cr. Rev. No. 129/2026) The Additional Sessions Judge allowed Sachdeva's revision petition, setting aside the trial court's order that denied release of Rs. 1,00,000 frozen in a bank account. The court found that since the complainant clarified the amount was inadvertently transferred to a colleague (not fraud), the investigation was closed via cancellation report, and both the investigating agency and State consented to release, continued freezing served no purpose and caused undue hardship. The court directed immediate unfreezing and return of the funds to the petitioner's account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case